Would a tort victim who is injured by a product sold by the sales subsidiary appreciate that only its assets are available to pay his torts claim?Is it important that the victim is ignorant of corporation law and is not aware that the parent and subsidiaries are separate corporations?Does a tort victim have the same ability as a contract creditor to check out the corporate structure of the business before being injured by the product?Would a believer in justice theory see a difference between a contract creditor and a tort victim?