write in a legal terminilogy. In preparing for the meeting with Mr. Leighton, it would be crucial to outline the potential breaches of both the firm's policies and the Legal Profession Uniform Law Australian Solicitors' Conduct Rules 2015. Solicitor Phillip Gould's engagement with Mrs. Jennings, a client of the Leighton + Costello Law firm, raises potential conflicts of interest, potentially violating Rule 11, which mandates a solicitor to avoid conflicts between duties owed to current clients. The discrepancy in Solicitor Gould's timesheet, charging his time with Mrs. Jennings for a Corporate Restructure matter, could be seen as a breach of the firm's policies on accurate timekeeping and honesty, as well as Rule 5, which prohibits dishonest and disreputable conduct. If Solicitor Gould's interaction was driven by personal interests, it could be seen as a breach of Rule 12, which prohibits a solicitor from allowing their own interests to conflict with their duties to a client. If Solicitor Gould discussed the case without the knowledge or consent of her solicitor, it could be seen as a breach of Rule 33, which governs communication with another solicitor's client. Overall, these actions could be seen as a breach of Rule 4, which outlines other fundamental ethical duties of a solicitor.In the meeting with Mr. Leighton, it would be important to present these concerns clearly and objectively, providing the evidence observed and explaining the potential implication for the firm