Write into the results section of the scientific report:

Steps of the data analysis and also of the data filtering and that we will run an ANOVA together for the reaction type data and then you can repeat this analysis for the error rates. OK, wait so. I will share my screen. So in the first step, gorilla gave us one Excel file for each subject and in this Excel file I already showed the file to you some. Days ago or some weeks ago you can find for each subject for. Every single subtask. The reaction time data and whether there was an error or not. The stimuli for the first, for the 2nd and for the last subtask. Also the response. Uh, which they gave right? And based on this? I created a single file where the data of every subject is included. For instance, you can see subject one with the mapping one. And you can see there is lots of a lot of data for this subject. So wait, I think It's still subject. It's only subject 1 S. And then I took the data of the second subject and I included it here and at the end I have the file, a single Excel file with the data of all subjects. Then in the next. Yeah, there was the data filtering here. There were different criteria that we used. So we analyzed the data in the interruption task right. Because your question was whether the pre interruption subtask is activated during secondary task processing, right? And here in this fire. Then I excluded all react for maybe we will start like that we excluded all practice trials and the first trial in each block so. For the reaction time analysis, we also excluded trials in which the reaction time data was more than three standard deviation. Participants mean per condition. And also trials with an error in SUBTASK 123 are the interruption task and for the error analysis we only excluded the practice blocks and the first trial in each block and then. We receive the following file. So in this file. You can see the mean reaction times and the mean error rates for each subject for all relevant conditions. For instance reaction time, subtask one in non interrupted trials reaction time, subtask 2IN non interrupted trials. Then reaction time in subtask to interrupted trials when the interruption was. Before task two and UM. If this was an congruent interrupt, so if this was the condition with the congruent interruption, but this is not so relevant for you. The same for Subtask 3 and then you have also the the reaction time data for the interruption task. So this is very relevant to you. So we have here the reaction time in the interruption task when the interruption occurs before subtask 2 and when it was concurrent. The same case for. With the incongruent condition. And then here for subtask 3. Also congruent and incongruent. So now you had two predictions. Your first prediction was that task interruptions impair the performance after the interruption. So in the subtask. After an interruption and the second prediction was or the second question. Was that whether the subtask that you performed before the interruption is still activated when performing the interruption task? And to test these two predictions, we have to run or conduct 2 anovas for the reaction time data and two anovas for. The error data. So at first we will. Conduct together the reaction time analysis for the resumption costs or for the first prediction.