write Introduction make it Engaging and thoughtful summarization of the ethical dilemma that goes beyond simply satisfying the requirements; shows critical thinking by identifying weaknesses in arguments. Interesting and well-considered summary that meets the requirements. Topic is summarized with some thought and care. Does not explain the project. Presents conflicting, incoherent or non-existent overview: Topic: Do Standard Medical Ethics Apply in Disaster Conditions? Standard medical ethics, which includes concepts such as autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice, are intended to guide healthcare practitioners in their practices. However, in catastrophe situations, resource constraints and haste might make these concepts difficult to apply (Beauchamp & Childress, 2013). One fundamental biomedical ethical dilemma in catastrophe situations is the distribution of limited resources. Some say that resources should be allocated following the principle of justice, which promotes equitable distribution. This viewpoint contends that regardless of condition, every individual should have an equal opportunity to receive treatment (Daniels, 2008). This approach is sometimes defended by egalitarian ideologies that highlight equitable access to healthcare as a fundamental right (Sen, 2009). On the other hand, some advocate for a utilitarian approach that stresses the greatest good for the most significant number (Mill, 1863). This viewpoint may argue for directing resour