WRITING ASSIGNMENT Papers should be 34 pages in length. 12-point font. double spaced, with reasonable margins. Do not ratate the questions in your paper: line should (a) identity the relenant fans. (5) determine the applicable rules and principles rm the tort. (e) analyze how the rule and principle: specically apply to the given set of rm. and (:1) state a concise and welldreasonad conclusion that hagicallyrllousfrorn your analysis. FRENCH NIGERIAN 011. Following graduation, you become employed by a corporation that specializes in the manulachrre and exporting of oil drilling equipan Your company enters into a contract to sell US$15 million- worth of equipment to the French government, which is engaged in oil drilling operations in Nigeria. To save legal costs. the company uses the same contract as they used when dealing with a company in Scotland that bought similar equipment. The terms are in English. and the amount of the contract is set forth in US dollars. 'Ihere are no provisions concerning language, legal forum. or applicable law. The French government accepts the equipment but refuses to pay. Your company brings a lawsuit against the French government in a US court to enforce the agreement. Please answer the following questions: 1. The French government claims that the ofcials who signed the contract were confused by its terms because it was in English. For that reason. they claim that the contract is unenforceable. What is your companfs defense to this claim? How should the court rule on this issue? 2. The French government claims that, according to the Doctrine of Sovereign Immunity. your company cannot sue them in a US court. What is your company's defense to this claim? How should the court rule on this issue? 3. The French government does not agree that the US court has any jurisdiction ova either their company or the dispute. because the contract is silent as to forum. What is your company's defense to this claim? How should the court rule on this issue? 4. The French government does not agree that US contract law should apply and claims that the France law is the correct set of laws to govern the dispute. Even if French law is ruled inapplicable. the French government argues that, because the contract is carried out through drilling operations in Nigeria. Nigerian law should be used instead of US law. What is your company's defense to these claims? How should the court rule on this issue