WUTDLIVIID e There are issues relating to the execution of the Second Agreement. The fact above outlines the issue as to whether the Second Agreement was signed by Mr Hank. Assuming it was not, there is a question as to whether it was signed with the authority of Mr Hank or of Abercrombie Pty Ltd. Discuss the issues pertaining to authority in relation to the Second Agreement. o What is the effect of the statutory presumptions contained in the Corporations Act and the Indoor Management Rule in relation to the Second Agreement? e What is the proper way, in terms of procedure and authority, to conclude the Second Agreement? In the process of working your way through answering these questions, you should make sure you always state the source of the relevant legal rules (e.g., a section of the Corporations Act or a court case) and apply those legal rules to the facts. You may alsofind it useful to argue 'in the alternative'. For example, if you argue that the court would likely find that there was authority to conclude the Second Agreement, then (in addition to exploring the legal implications of this) you may want to write something like: While | have argued above that the court would likely find that there was authority to conclude the Second Agreement, it is also worth considering the legal implications if the court determines that there was no authority. In that case ... Conversely, if you argue that a court would likely find there was no authority, then you might like to discuss the legal implications if the court instead finds that there was authority. Please do not make extended assumptions of fact other than that given. Should you wish to assume certain facts for the sake of argument, please clearly state your assumption