Question
X, a newspaper columnist, while having a bank transaction, overheard a bank teller informing a co-employee that Y, the municipal mayor, has just P10,000.00 in
X, a newspaper columnist, while having a bank transaction, overheard a bank teller informing a co-employee that Y, the municipal mayor, has just P10,000.00 in his bank account and that his next check might probably bounce. X wrote this information in his newspaper column. Thus. Y fled a complaint against X for violation of the Secrecy of Bank Deposit Act. Decide.
X is not liable because he was in good faith when overheard the remark of the bank teller to co-employee
X who merely overheard the remark of the bank teller to co-employee and writing the same in his newspaper column is neither the inquiry nor disclosure contemplated by law
X is liable because bank deposits are absolutely confidential
X is liable because bank deposits must not be examined, or locked into by any person
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started