XII In the Case of A vs. B, B moved for the inhibition of Judge X on the ground that Judge X is the first cousin of Atty. Y, counsel for A. Under Rule 137 that relationship disqualifies the judge from handling the case. Despite the said relationship Judge X denied the motion for inhibition and proceeded to try the case which he conducted very fairly and with utmost competence. Judgment was rendered in favor of A. If you are counsel for B what will be your remedy against the said judgment. XIII A borrowed from B the latter's car on February 15. The agreement was for A to return the car on March 15. It is already March 25 but A would not return to B the car despite repeated demands from B. According to A, B still has a loan obligation to A. Allegedly, of the PhpIM loan which B obtained from A sometime in 2005 A only paid Php800,000.00 in 2007. B said, however, that when the obligation fell due on December 2007 he paid everything including the interests and other surcharges. If you are counsel for B what will you do to protect your client's interest especially so that the lack of mobility is taking a toll on B's business schedules? (5 points) XIV In the March 1 decision rendered in the case of A vs. B for unlawful detainer, the MTC ordered B to vacate the premises occupied by his manufacturing business plus payment of damages. Both A and B received the decision on March 5. Alleging that the case is one of accion publiciana involving a property with an assessed value of Php100,000.00 and filed in court 15 months after the last demand, B filed a notice of appeal to the RTC on March 10. A filed a motion for execution on March 20