Yasmin is an avid mountain biker. She regularly competes in mountain biking races at a privately owned bike track in the Gold Coast hinterland: The owner of the bike track (and sponsor of the races) is Mountain Madness Pty Ltd, an Australian corporation, One Saturday, Yasmin is racing at Mountain Madness's track. As she is coming around a curve, she starts going too fast and loses control, Yasmin is thrown over the handlebars of her bike and suffers two broken wrists. A few seconds later, another race competitor, Beate, inadvertently runs over her foot because Beate could not safely stop in time after Yasmin's crash - but Yasmin miraculously is not further injured. The mountain bike trails had been properly maintained and Yasmin had her helmet on, as Mountain Madness had required as a condition of entering the race. Which of the following is most incorrect: Choose the SINGLE answer that best answers the question or best completes the sentence. Do NOT select multiple answers (ie, please IGNORE the instructions below where it says to choose "at least one" correct answer - this is a computer bug that I cannot get rid of). Yasmin would have a good claim against Beate for the tort of battery; B Mountain Madness Pty Ltd owed Yasmin a duty of care; C Yasmin would most likely be unsuccessful in an action against Beate for negligence; D Yasmin would most likely be unsuccessful in an action against Mountain Madness Pty Ltd for negligence as a result of the defence of votenti non fit injuria; Assume Yasmin fell off her bike not because she was going too fast but rather because her bike seat E unexpectedly broke in half. If she had recently purchased the mountain bike seat, Yasmin may have claims against the seller of the hike seat for breaches of one or more guarantees in the Australian Consumer Law