Yasmin suffered a personal injury while operating her lawn mower at home in California. She filed suit in state court against the manufacturer, John Deere. John Deere is incorporated in Delaware with its principal place of business in Illinois.

Yasmin also sued the seller, Home Depot, which is incorporated in California with its principal place of business in California. Yasmin and Home Depot informally agreed to settle out of court, but the agreement was subject to approval by Home Depot's insurer. Before a final agreement was reached regarding settlement with Home Depot, John Deere filed a motion in state court to remove the case to federal court.

Yasmin opposes the removal. Should the court permit the removal to federal court?

Identify the issue: What rule of law is John Deere relying on to remove the case to federal court, and more specifically, what is the specific element of the rule that this case rests upon?

Please define and explain the legal elements required for diversity$-$of$-$citizenship cases.

What is the conclusion: Based on the facts, should the cyurt grant the removal to federal court? Why or why not? Please support your answer with facts from the case.