Yolanda agrees to bathe and groom Wendy's dog Fluffy for $20. Yolanda agreed to the price before seeing Fluffy, a very plump, grouchy Pembroke Welsh Corgi dog with lots of hair. Yolanda tells Wendy that if she is going to groom Fluffy, the price will be $30. Wendy agrees but exclaims in exasperation that the dog is, after all, named "Fluffy!" Yolanda bathes and grooms Fluffy, but Wendy will only pay $20. Which of the following is correct regarding Yolanda's entitlement to the extra $10? O Yolanda is entitled to the extra $10 because a valid unilateral contract existed. O Yolanda is entitled to the extra $10 because a valid bilateral contract existed. O Assuming the unforeseen circumstances rule is inapplicable, Yolanda is not entitled to the extra $10 because Wendy's promise to pay $30 was illusory. O Assuming the unforeseen circumstances rule is inapplicable, Yolanda is not entitled to the extra $10 because past consideration was involved. 623 O Assuming the unforeseen circumstances rule is inapplicable, Yolanda is not entitled to the extra $10 because she had a preexisting duty to bathe and groom Fluffy for $20.

Yolanda agrees to bathe and groom Wendy's dog Fluffy for $20. Yolanda agreed to the price before seeing Fluffy, a very plump, grouchy Pembroke Welsh Corgi dog with lots of hair. Yolanda tells Wendy that if she is going to groom Fluffy, the price will be $30. Wendy agrees but exclaims in exasperation that the dog is, after all, named "Fluffy!" Yolanda bathes and grooms Fluffy, but Wendy will only pay $20. Which of the following is correct regarding Yolanda's entitlement to the extra $10 ? Yolanda is entitled to the extra $10 because a valid unilateral contract existed. Yolanda is entitled to the extra $10 because a valid bilateral contract existed. Assuming the unforeseen circumstances rule is inapplicable, Yolanda is not entitied to the extra $10 because Wendy's promise to pay $30 was illusory. Assuming the unforeseen circumstances rule is inapplicable, Yolanda is not entitled to the extra $10 because past consideration was involved. Assuming the unforeseen circumstances rule is inapplicable, Yolanda is not entitled to the extra $10 because she had a preexisting duty to bathe and groom Fluffy for $20