Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

You are 40 years old (very successful in your career), are in the highest (53.53%) tax bracket in Ontario/Canada, have used up all of your

You are 40 years old (very successful in your career), are in the highest (53.53%) tax bracket in Ontario/Canada, have used up all of your RRSP and TFSA room, but would like to save (more) money in a tax-efficient manner. It seems you have an extra $50,000 to save every year for the next 20 years, which in theory you could invest in an exchange traded fund (ETF) that charges 30 basis points and invests in a globally diversified portfolio of stocks from around the world. The (expected) pre-tax rate of return on this ETF is 6% per year, of which 2% is dividends and 4% is capital appreciation. However, because most of the stocks are invested outside of Canada, the 2% dividend yield will be taxed at your (highest) marginal tax rate and the capital gains (when you eventually sell the ETFs or the manager rebalances holdings) will be taxed as capital gains.

Now, an eager life insurance agent approaches you with the following proposition. You can spend $50,000 on something called a variable universal life (VUL) insurance policy which will be invested in an underlying portfolio of mutual funds, but will generate absolutely no tax liability for the next 20 years because all the inside growth and investment build-up is accumulated tax free. No annual tax liability. Then, if and when you (ever) need the money, you can borrow against the cash-value of the policy, which doesnt incur any tax liability either. Finally, if and when you happen to die, the entire account (plus a death benefit) will go to your beneficiaries also tax free. Basically (the insurance agent claims), its a win-win-win situation, and the government will never get access to your money. Of course, nothing in life is free and there is a 3% annual fee on the value of the mutual funds inside the insurance policy in addition to any mortality risk charges. The insurance agent claims that 3% is much lower the 53.53% percent.

Question: Please discuss and compare this investment & insurance strategy in detail and whether you think the insurance agents idea makes sense. Be as specific as possible. I dont want to read general and empty statements claiming that each person is different and that it depends on your preferences and that as a society we should all try to get along, etc. You know me by now.

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access with AI-Powered Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Students also viewed these Finance questions