You are a member of the selection team that has been charged with hiring a plant manager. Review the information about Dynamo and the data on the eight candidates and develop the following:

1. A rank ordering of your top three choices for the Pittsburgh job based on the information you have now.
2. An in-depth discussion of how this rank ordering was reached (a rationale for some candidates being ranked higher than others and for others not being ranked). As part of this analysis, comment on the recommendation by the Ad Hoc committee on Diversity that Mr. Jackson should be hired since he meets the minimum qualifications and Dynamo has an affirmative action program.

Upload your preliminary rankings and justification here but also bring a copy to class on April 13^th, when we will continue the exercise. During class, you will be meeting with the other members of the hiring team in order to come to consensus on who to hire. You will also be asked to identify ways in which to improve the selection process. For the complete file, please see Hiring a Plant Manager at Dynamo.

• 1492142399 04/13/2017 11:59pm File Upload
• Google Doc

Upload a file, or choose a file you've already uploaded. File:

remove empty attachment

Add Another File remove empty attachment Click here to find a file you've already uploaded

• 7665291 my files9428309 Submissions9428310 SP17: HUMAN RESOURCES MANAGEMENT: 180268044893 Zimpfer vs Palm Beach County.docx
• 68045000 Zimpfer vs Palm Beach County-1.docx
• 68109332 Personal Examples.docx
• 68428247 Kizzie Wade Resume.docx
• 68755208 CTA 7-C- Allegations of age and race discrimination against Ford (1).docx
• 7779657 unfiled56066427 Scan_20150502.tiff
• 56066429 Scan_20150502_2.tiff
• 56066430 Scan_20150502_3.tiff
• 56066432 Scan_20150502_4.tiff
• 56066434 Kizzie Wade Project 2015.docx
• 57357199 Week_2_Time_Value_of_Money_Template.xlsx
• 57357235 Time Value of Money Template.xls
• 57498118 Week 3 - Bond Valuation.xlsx
• 57641667 Week 4 - Chapter 7 NPV and Other Investment Rules.xls
• 57775613 Week 8.xls
• 57775642 Finance Chapter 8.xls
• 57911741 Week 6.xls
• 58184838 Session 8 template.xls
• 58310415 Session 9 Spreadsheet Template.xlsx
• 58574671 Week 11 Forum.xlsx
• 58714380 Week 12 Dividend.xlsx
• 60627195 PowerPoint Presentation - Did You Know.pptx
• 7665327 profile pictures
• 7665292 conversation attachments58301018 Group Project Steps 1-6 f-h (4).xlsx
• 58334718 Peer+Evaluation+Rating+Form.doc
• 58334799 Peer+Evaluation+Rating+Form-1.doc
• 60587839 PowerPoint Presentation - Did You Know.pptx
• 61675548 Exam 1.docx
• 64632961 Wegmans.pptx
• 64709750 Break Even Point.xls
• 65167482 scan0003.pdf
• 68877916 Case Brief - Walmart Stores vs Dukes.docx
• 68879069 Case Problem 1 - Law 8.6.docx
• 69015319 Discussion Question HRM 7.docx

Cancel Submit Assignment Submitting...

Before you can submit assignments directly from Google Drive you need to authorize Canvas to access your Google Drive account:Authorize Google Drive Access

Rubric

988303

Can't change a rubric once you've started using it. Find a Rubric

Title:

Find Rubric

Dynamo case

You've already rated students with this rubric. Any major changes could affect their assessment results.

Dynamo case

CriteriaRatingsPts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Candidates ranked _3607view longer description

threshold: pts

Edit criterion description

Full Marks

5.0 pts blankEdit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating

No Marks

0.0 pts blank_2Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating

This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion. pts

/ 5.0 pts

--

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Rationale of selection _9565view longer description

threshold: pts

Edit criterion description

All applicable data considered. Argument made based on relevant theory and practice.

15.0 pts _152Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating

Some rationale presented. Selection based on data vs feeling.

10.0 pts _9993Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating

Selection primarily based on opinion or feeling.

5.0 pts _2926Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating

No rationale provided

0.0 pts _382Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating

This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion. pts

/ 15.0 pts

--

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Description of criterion view longer description

threshold: 5 pts

Edit criterion description

Full Marks

5 pts blankEdit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating

No Marks

0 pts blank_2Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating

This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion. pts

/ 5 pts

--

Total Points: 20.0