You are an employer. Please write letter of support for a public hospital employee, a certified registered nurse anesthetist (CRNA) named Joanna Smith, to present to the Employee Residency Review Committee to receive an exemption from the termination under the New Jersey First Act. In this letter, you should argue a"critical need"of this employee based on:

1. Long-standing shortages of CRNAs in the state of New Jersey and your hospital/department specifically, and

2. Any other piece of information/data/statistics you can find that would strengthen your position that this employee is valuable and would bedifficult to replaceshould the exemption not be granted.

Please use phrases in bold in your letter of support.

Thank you.

Further instructions

FORMAT: I dislike the style, format, and content of this letter. I already basically wrote half of the letter myself, and do not see any new valuable ideas or strong points that this writer developed to convince the committee. For example, the writer mentions it is a "public employee" but why do they mention that? Is that a point? It is not clear. Is the public healthcare sector experiences more staffing problems than the private? It does not look like whoever wrote this letter even tried to research or understand the issue. One strong point that underlines the "critical need" could be, for example, that we are, in fact, in the midst of a healthcare crisis (COVID-19), and cannot afford to lose even a single healthcare worker, but the writer fails to mention even the obvious! I see zero valuable points/ideas developed by this writer that would help me. This letter is also wordy and somewhat redundant, while it should be concise and to the point. The bottom line, it does not help anyone to stand out. I requested one of the ten top writers, but I feel I could have written a stronger letter. By the way, the requested discipline says "law," but I doubt this writer has a law degree, let alone a Ph.D. This letter should be written in a different language and style as if someone argues their position in court.