You are an Examiner for the Refund Integrity Program in the GST/HST Audit Division of the...
Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!
Question:
![image text in transcribed](https://s3.amazonaws.com/si.experts.images/answers/2024/05/6653a60c40027_0276653a60bb40eb.jpg)
![image text in transcribed](https://s3.amazonaws.com/si.experts.images/answers/2024/05/6653a60d37f02_0286653a60ca56c7.jpg)
![image text in transcribed](https://s3.amazonaws.com/si.experts.images/answers/2024/05/6653a60ddeb57_0296653a60d6bb66.jpg)
Transcribed Image Text:
You are an Examiner for the Refund Integrity Program in the GST/HST Audit Division of the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA). Using sophisticated analytical tools, you are able to identify GST/HST returns that have a high risk of containing errors or omissions. You are currently working on a pre-assessment review for a GST/HST return filed by Kellogg Adelaide Ltd. (KAL) for its April 1-June 30, 2021 reporting period. The return was filed claiming a refund of $62,973. Using records accessible by the CRA, you are able to determine that KAL was incorporated on February 4, 2021 and has not yet filed a corporate tax return. The company also registered a GST/HST account on April 25, 2021 with an effective registration date of April 1. Filing frequency is quarterly and the period under review is KAL's first GST/HST filing. You have sent a pre-assessment review letter to the business address on file requesting a description of the commercial activity, a detailed general ledger of sales and input tax credits (ITCs), and copies of the five largest sales and purchasing invoices. KAL's accounting controller has submitted the following information in response to your letter: KAL is engaged in the development and construction of a new residential condominium building at 9000 Adelaide Street in Toronto, Ontario. The parcel of land was purchased on April 25, 2021 for $16,000,000. Revenue will come from the sales of the individual condominium units upon the building's completion in 5 years. The only revenue in the period was a management fee of $25,000 received from Kellogg Yonge Street Inc. (KYSI), a corporation wholly owned by the same individual who owns KAL. No HST was charged on this fee by KAL and no ITC was claimed by KYSI since the parties have made a closely related group election. The controller was able to provide a copy of the completed election form. The following breakdown was provided for the $62,973 of ITCs reported: You are an Examiner for the Refund Integrity Program in the GST/HST Audit Division of the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA). Using sophisticated analytical tools, you are able to identify GST/HST returns that have a high risk of containing errors or omissions. You are currently working on a pre-assessment review for a GST/HST return filed by Kellogg Adelaide Ltd. (KAL) for its April 1-June 30, 2021 reporting period. The return was filed claiming a refund of $62,973. Using records accessible by the CRA, you are able to determine that KAL was incorporated on February 4, 2021 and has not yet filed a corporate tax return. The company also registered a GST/HST account on April 25, 2021 with an effective registration date of April 1. Filing frequency is quarterly and the period under review is KAL's first GST/HST filing. You have sent a pre-assessment review letter to the business address on file requesting a description of the commercial activity, a detailed general ledger of sales and input tax credits (ITCs), and copies of the five largest sales and purchasing invoices. KAL's accounting controller has submitted the following information in response to your letter: KAL is engaged in the development and construction of a new residential condominium building at 9000 Adelaide Street in Toronto, Ontario. The parcel of land was purchased on April 25, 2021 for $16,000,000. Revenue will come from the sales of the individual condominium units upon the building's completion in 5 years. The only revenue in the period was a management fee of $25,000 received from Kellogg Yonge Street Inc. (KYSI), a corporation wholly owned by the same individual who owns KAL. No HST was charged on this fee by KAL and no ITC was claimed by KYSI since the parties have made a closely related group election. The controller was able to provide a copy of the completed election form. The following breakdown was provided for the $62,973 of ITCs reported:
Expert Answer:
Posted Date:
Students also viewed these accounting questions
-
J. D. Salinger's 1951 novel, The Catcher in the Rye, is widely regarded as an American classic. Catcher, which is still protected by copyright, tells the story of a sometimes disillusioned...
-
Be capable of establishing the appropriate domain definition for the firm.
-
How have those who were charged fees for access to health records challenged?
-
The Build-It Construction Company enters into a contract on January 1, 2011, to construct a 20-story office building for $42,000,000. During the construction period, many change orders are made to...
-
(a) Read about the Higgs boson particle from the WSJ. Using the five sigma cutoff point mentioned in the article and the Excel command NORM.DIST, specify the actual Excel command you use to get a...
-
Solow Model Problems. Suppose the economy of Creed can be described with the following production function: Yt = K L..; where K is the capital stock and L is the number of workers (population). The...
-
One of your jobs as a Business Development Officer is to make sure that your company's brand, product, and package are available (e.g. 1kilo pack Vida hotdog, half kilo Vida hotdog, etc.). One of...
-
A major corporation has hundreds of major development projects underway at the same time. Each project is meant to go through an independent formal technical review process, but all of the scheduling...
-
1. What are the external factors (i.e., technology, society, infrastructure) present that have led to the potential for incorporation of this new form of transportation? 2. What analysis process must...
-
executive summary about the three most significant critical success factors for effective health and safety management systems
-
The performance management system that is already in place is archaic and inefficient. The three major areas of concern are: 1. The difference between the existing condition and the state that is...
-
"dismissing drivers who failed the internal drug test" (Assuming these drivers are employed by the company/ir are subcontractors for the company). Is this a prevention or appraisal quality cost?
-
Explain the advantages and disadvantages of the external recruitment alternatives. (LO 4)
-
What are some challenges to effective recruiting? (LO 1, 2)
-
Explain how social media and other online sources are used to recruit candidates. (LO 4, 5)
![Mobile App Logo](https://dsd5zvtm8ll6.cloudfront.net/includes/images/mobile/finalLogo.png)
Study smarter with the SolutionInn App