You are auditing a manufacturing company that produces 4G technology to support mobile telephony The company has had healthy annual net income for the last 10 years, but they currently lack the technological abilities to shift to 5G technologies and beyond without significant investment Upon review of their asset portfolio, the company decides to invest significantly in new manufacturing equipment The impact of this is that much of their current equipment is obsolete The company believes that this qualifies as a case for impairment under their impairment policy and under AASB 136 The company carries a significant impairment loss for this financial period They sought the expertise of an external valuer to support the determination of fair value in calculating the recoverable amount All the valuations are carefully documented for your benefit The valuer makes a couple of assumptions, including that the 4G manufacturing assets are only sellable in Australia Asset Carrying Amount$ recoverable a mount$) 4G Technology Patents 3400000 800000 Manufacturing Equipment 30000000 2500000 factory and premise 41000000 20000000 You are not overly concerned about the patent valuation, as this is jurisdictionally specific to Australia However, you are less sure about the other two impairments claimed (totally $48,500,000) These figures concern you for a couple of reasons a) 4G technology still has value in Australia and you also know that there are active markets overseas for 4G technology b) You are unsure why the factory premises is impaired in value the factory building is still in good condition and would easily be converted to support 5G manufacturing or sold at a likely profit Consider the following questions i) In this scenario, advise what your options, as auditor, would be ii) Assume that you raise your concerns and suggest alternative valuations (based on expert valuations) that you believe constitute more appropriate fair value calculations What would your options be if management chose not to act on your advice and refused to change their proposed financial statements

The Answer is in the image, click to view ...

Answered step by step

Verified Expert Solution

Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

Posted on Sep 30, 2024

You are auditing a manufacturing company that produces 4G technology to support mobile telephony. The company has had healthy annual net income for the last

You are auditing a manufacturing company that produces 4G technology to support mobile telephony. The company has had healthy annual net income for the last 10 years, but they currently lack the technological abilities to shift to 5G technologies and beyond without significant investment. Upon review of their asset portfolio, the company decides to invest significantly in new manufacturing equipment. The impact of this is that much of their current equipment is obsolete. The company believes that this qualifies as a case for impairment under their impairment policy and under AASB 136. The company carries a significant impairment loss for this financial period. They sought the expertise of an external valuer to support the determination of fair value in calculating the recoverable amount. All the valuations are carefully documented for your benefit. The valuer makes a couple of assumptions, including that the 4G manufacturing assets are only sellable in Australia.

Asset	Carrying Amount$	recoverable a mount$)
4G Technology Patents	3400000	800000
Manufacturing Equipment	30000000	2500000
factory and premise	41000000	20000000

You are not overly concerned about the patent valuation, as this is jurisdictionally specific to Australia. However, you are less sure about the other two impairments claimed (totally $48,500,000). These figures concern you for a couple of reasons: a) 4G technology still has value in Australia and you also know that there are active markets overseas for 4G technology; b) You are unsure why the factory/premises is impaired in value the factory building is still in good condition and would easily be converted to support 5G manufacturing or sold at a likely profit.

Consider the following questions: i) In this scenario, advise what your options, as auditor, would be? ii) Assume that you raise your concerns and suggest alternative valuations (based on expert valuations) that you believe constitute more appropriate fair value calculations. What would your options be if management chose not to act on your advice and refused to change their proposed financial statements?