You are employed as a paralegal at the law firm of Attorneys & Associates, and you are currently assisting the lead attorney, Juan Escobar-Henao, in a civil case representing Jane Doe. Ms. Doe is in a dispute with a commercial landlord over a lease involving several hundred stores and warehouses. The case has nearly concluded the discovery phase and both sides have filed several motions. In reviewing the latest motion filed by Attorney Escobar, you realize that the case relied on in the motion is \"Kiser-John, Inc. v. Trident,\" a 20XX case from your state's Supreme Court. This case is on point and directly supports your client's position. This case is favorable to Jane Doe in its holding that specific lease provisions are not enforceable. As you prepare to draft additional motions, you discover \"Smith v. Jones, Inc.,\" a more recent case that overrules the decision in \"Kiser-John, Inc. v. Trident.\" The legal theory of Ms. Doe's case relies almost exclusively on the holding in the \"Trident\" case. The \"Smith v. Jones" case is damaging, if not fatal, to your client's case. Prepare a legal memorandum regarding how a paralegal or attorney should address this issue. Specifically, how should an advocate address the issue of a legal authority that is helpful to your client being overruled in a subsequent and binding decision? What are the ethical issues raised in such a scenario