You are still able to go outside so you decide to buy a bike so you can go for long bike rides. You nd an ad on Kijiji where someone is advertising a bike for sale. You book an appointment to go see it, making sure to keep your distance from the seller. The seller, Scott, tells you that the bike is the latest 2020 Trek model. You are happy to hear that. You have been looking for this 2020 model because it is faster than the older models. You ask Scott if you can take the bike for a test ride, but he refuses for fear that if you touch the bike, you will give him COVID19. Scott tells you \"This bike is comfortable and you will love it\". You are happy to hear this because you want comfort for the long rides you are planning to take. Scott also tells you that \"there is no front light but there is no law requiring there to be a front light on bikes\". You do your research and decide that you will buy the bike because it is a good price. After you buy the bike, you nd out that it is not a 2020 model but a 2018 model and it is not as fast as you thought it would be (although there is no evidence that Scott knew this). Even worse for you, the rst time you take the bike out in the dark, you collide with a pedestrian because you did not see her in the dark. The bike is totally destroyed. You also nd out that you are legally required to have a front light on a bike in the dark. Are any of the three statements made by Scott misrepresentations? If so, what kind are they and what are the remedies available? In your analysis, please include the denition of a misrepresentation and discuss whether each of the three statements made by Scott meet the requirements of misrepresentation