You are tasked to source information that can be used to develop a checklist to evaluate an eor m-learning offering (choose one). There is a need for such a checklist. Research regularly reports on the challenges associated with the development, implementation, and use of elearning systems. An evaluation checklist will, by design, include only items that are considered crucial (or non-negotiable) if e- or m-learning is to be successful.

The structure and format of your solution will be presented in table format. Two categories and three constructs are provided as examples of the required format and approach.

1. Please do not use landscape orientation to present your table. Rather use a smaller font.

2. If extra columns are added to the right of the table (not required), your review can serve as a checklist to evaluate a current e- or m-learning system. Here we are only interested in the foundation of such a checklist i.e., the categories and constructs that need to be included, and motivating their inclusion from the formal research literature.

3. You are allowed to make use of the general internet to source ideas for categories and constructs. You do not have to provide a citation or reference for these sources, but they must be supported by formal research evidence in the last column. Your personal experience as a Unisa student may also be valuable in identifying categories and constructs!

4. The motivation should not exceed a paragraph i.e., do not provide a lengthy summary of the studys aims, methods, results etc. You should try and source more than one article in your motivation for each construct.

5. In your list of references at the end of the table, provide a direct link (URL or DOI) to the article.

6. We recommend the following approach: a) Search for articles using key terms of your choice and identify an article that covers the category and/or constructs adequately. For example, if you decide to do a literature review on e-learning articles and use the terms "learning management system easy to use" in Google Scholar, you will find this listed article on the first page, which covers the ease of use of LMSs. If you click on the "Cited by n" and "Related articles" links that are available at the bottom of the search result, you may find relevant articles to assist you in completing the table.

Note: This approach does not always work the first time you may have to change the search terms and/or click the "Related articles" link below another article listing to find more relevant articles. It is also possible (and good practice) to source more articles from the literature review and reference list of a single article. However, you should not use a single article and extract all your information from the article. The literature review of any article presents the author's narrative (train of thought, sources consulted, points being made etc.).

You should source and review the referenced article yourself to see if it does not contain other or more information/points of interest/concepts that you can use, or if some information cannot perhaps be re-interpreted to suit your narrative. b) When working on your review, use an Excel table that will allow you to move rows easily if the need arises after reflection