You are the manager-in-charge of the music concert for a well-known local singer. The music concert is scheduled to be held during the Chinese Lunar Year in 2021. Around 30 dancers are required to dance with the singer in many occasions in the music concert. You would like to outsource this job to an agent company to solicit 30 dancers. Three agent companies show interest in accepting this job invitation. Their terms of offer are as follows: Company A All are experienced local dancers with aged 24-28. Total Contract price: HK$40,000 Company B All are new local dancers with aged 19-23. Total Contract price: HK$15,000 Company C All are overseas experienced dancers with aged 23-27. The company will use its own way" to arrange the visa for them. Total Contract price: HK$20,000 Company A: it is a caring company and it would not ill-treat the dancers. That is why the contract price seems not attractive. It is their mission to maintain the dancer industry healthy. Ill-treatment will dissuade new blood to join this industry. Company B: The dancers work part-time only. The cost is the lowest so that you can earn more money from this music concert. The audience are not interested in understanding the background of the dancers, they concentrate on the singer only Company C: The cost is also competitive. The experienced dancers can provide brilliant performance for your music concert. The company will arrange the work visa for them. It will handle all the problems. Audience may not know they are 0 not locals, or may not know that the dancers have no work visa to dance on the performance stage. The company would bear all such liability. What is your choice? Why? How can you make the invitation more ethically sound