You are the state attorney general and pleased that a county in your state that borders Mexico has been remarkably effective in the past year in reducing drug-related violent crime. When you talk to the sheriff, you find out that this is because they have doubled the number of deputies, increased electronic surveillance and the number of patrol cars. Since their budget has not been increased, you find out that they are stopping motorists routinely, asking if they're carrying cash, and ordering them to sign over the cash or face felony charges of money laundering or other serious crimes. This is consistent with state asset forfeiture law, which allows the police to seize the profits of crime without a conviction. What, if anything, would you do?