You are to evaluate three cloud computing service provider - Google, Amazon AWS, and Microsoft Azure. Develop your own criteria based on cloud computing standards (cost, applications, scalability, support, etc..). You can use google to get information on these cloud service providers.
Use the following template and recommend to the team project manager the cloud computing service provider. This is an individual assignment.
There was no critical IDENTIFICATION KEY provided this is all the question had.
CLOUD VENDOR EVALUATION REPORT CRITERIA CHECKLIST Discuss 'purpose of vendor evaluation - mention/summarize proposal. List criteria Scores available from 1-5. Basis that will be used to score vendors. for scoring must be listed with specific examples. Average Score #REF! #REF! #REF! 1. Company Information VENDOR1 VENDOR 2 VENDOR 3 BASIS FOR SCORE Proof of tinancial viability receives all points (i.e., Dun & Bradstreet Repor) Explained structure and org chart receives all points Proof of similar sized and focused companies experience receives all points Service department 24/7 with appropriate language capability receives all points POsitive references from four provided (checked) receives all points Financial Viability Organizational Structure Experience with Similar Companies 2 Service Department eferences 2 Proven external partnerships receives all points Partnerships 12 Average Score 3. Project Understanding VENDOR1 VENDOR 2 VENDOR 3 BASIS FOR SCORE Written section shows comprehension Written section shows comprehension Written section shows comprehension 13 Overall Comprehension of Project Understanding of the Business Requir 2 15 Understanding of the Business Vision 2 17 Average Score 4. Requirements VENDOR1 VENDOR 2 VENDOR 3 BASIS FOR SCORE Response if fully technically compliant Completeness of Vendor Response 17 Average Score 18 4. Requirements VENDOR1 VENDOR 2 VENDOR 3 BASIS FOR SCORE Response if fully technically compliant Completeness of Vendor Response 19 Vendor details ability to meet requirements Vendor Ability to Meet Requirements 20 21 Average Score 5. Product Viability & History VENDOR1 VENDOR 2 VENDOR 3 BASIS FOR SCORE Technology Is Sustainable Trackrecord of product history 23 Detailed roadmap for future product development Life-cycle is realistic for product updates Scores available from 1-5. Basis for scoring must be listed with New release process is comprehensive Product Roadmap Product Development Life-Cycle 25 Criteria Checklist 26 New Release Process 28 Average Score 6. Terms & Conditions VENDOR1 VENDOR 2 VENDOR 3 BASIS FOR SCORE Buyer duties favorable Terms& conditions favorable Outlines purchase details Detailed Buyer Duties 30 31 Terms & Condition.s Purchase Agreement Details Average Score 7. Vendor Software Demonstration VENDOR1 VENDOR 2 VENDOR 3 BASIS FOR SCORE Fully integrated solution receives full points 34 35 Solution ls Integrated Aligns with Company Objectives 36 37 Third-Party Products Shown 38 Ease of Use 39 System Performance 40 Flow &Simplicity 41 System Ability To Handle Requiremen 42 Flexibility, Tailorability, Extensibility 4 2 43 44 Application Robustness 45 46 8. Fee Summary 47 License Fees 48 Maintenance Fees 49 Purchase Timeline 50 Licensing Period 2 Average Score VENDOR VENDOR 2 VENDOR 3 BASIS FOR SCORE 2 3 2 5 52 Average Score 4 Change weights based on company requirements. Total score should 1.00 53 VENDOR 1 VENDOR 2 WEIGHTED WEIGHTED VENDOR 3 WEIGHTED SCORE CRITERIA SCORES 54 55 2. Company Information 56 3. Project Understanding 57 4. Requirements 58 5. Product Viability & History 59 6. Terms & Conditions 60 7. Vendor Demonstration WEIGHT NOTES 0.05 0.20 0.30 0.0 0.0 0.25 0.05 0.95 SCORE 0.67 1.20 0.15 0.21 0.67 0.18 SCORE 0.90 1.20 0.25 0.20 1.17 0.17 4.37 8.25 0.70 1.0x) 0.23 ()" 1.00 0.15 3.42 6.66 62 Total Score 5.92 CLOUD VENDOR EVALUATION REPORT CRITERIA CHECKLIST Discuss 'purpose of vendor evaluation - mention/summarize proposal. List criteria Scores available from 1-5. Basis that will be used to score vendors. for scoring must be listed with specific examples. Average Score #REF! #REF! #REF! 1. Company Information VENDOR1 VENDOR 2 VENDOR 3 BASIS FOR SCORE Proof of tinancial viability receives all points (i.e., Dun & Bradstreet Repor) Explained structure and org chart receives all points Proof of similar sized and focused companies experience receives all points Service department 24/7 with appropriate language capability receives all points POsitive references from four provided (checked) receives all points Financial Viability Organizational Structure Experience with Similar Companies 2 Service Department eferences 2 Proven external partnerships receives all points Partnerships 12 Average Score 3. Project Understanding VENDOR1 VENDOR 2 VENDOR 3 BASIS FOR SCORE Written section shows comprehension Written section shows comprehension Written section shows comprehension 13 Overall Comprehension of Project Understanding of the Business Requir 2 15 Understanding of the Business Vision 2 17 Average Score 4. Requirements VENDOR1 VENDOR 2 VENDOR 3 BASIS FOR SCORE Response if fully technically compliant Completeness of Vendor Response 17 Average Score 18 4. Requirements VENDOR1 VENDOR 2 VENDOR 3 BASIS FOR SCORE Response if fully technically compliant Completeness of Vendor Response 19 Vendor details ability to meet requirements Vendor Ability to Meet Requirements 20 21 Average Score 5. Product Viability & History VENDOR1 VENDOR 2 VENDOR 3 BASIS FOR SCORE Technology Is Sustainable Trackrecord of product history 23 Detailed roadmap for future product development Life-cycle is realistic for product updates Scores available from 1-5. Basis for scoring must be listed with New release process is comprehensive Product Roadmap Product Development Life-Cycle 25 Criteria Checklist 26 New Release Process 28 Average Score 6. Terms & Conditions VENDOR1 VENDOR 2 VENDOR 3 BASIS FOR SCORE Buyer duties favorable Terms& conditions favorable Outlines purchase details Detailed Buyer Duties 30 31 Terms & Condition.s Purchase Agreement Details Average Score 7. Vendor Software Demonstration VENDOR1 VENDOR 2 VENDOR 3 BASIS FOR SCORE Fully integrated solution receives full points 34 35 Solution ls Integrated Aligns with Company Objectives 36 37 Third-Party Products Shown 38 Ease of Use 39 System Performance 40 Flow &Simplicity 41 System Ability To Handle Requiremen 42 Flexibility, Tailorability, Extensibility 4 2 43 44 Application Robustness 45 46 8. Fee Summary 47 License Fees 48 Maintenance Fees 49 Purchase Timeline 50 Licensing Period 2 Average Score VENDOR VENDOR 2 VENDOR 3 BASIS FOR SCORE 2 3 2 5 52 Average Score 4 Change weights based on company requirements. Total score should 1.00 53 VENDOR 1 VENDOR 2 WEIGHTED WEIGHTED VENDOR 3 WEIGHTED SCORE CRITERIA SCORES 54 55 2. Company Information 56 3. Project Understanding 57 4. Requirements 58 5. Product Viability & History 59 6. Terms & Conditions 60 7. Vendor Demonstration WEIGHT NOTES 0.05 0.20 0.30 0.0 0.0 0.25 0.05 0.95 SCORE 0.67 1.20 0.15 0.21 0.67 0.18 SCORE 0.90 1.20 0.25 0.20 1.17 0.17 4.37 8.25 0.70 1.0x) 0.23 ()" 1.00 0.15 3.42 6.66 62 Total Score 5.92
