You do not need this detail to follow the arguments. But, if it helps to have some background, you can skim this informational sheet on the Crumbley trials HERE

2) Watch each of these videos. You are not expected to outline or master the specific laws in this case. Instead, just note specific statements the attorneys make based on stereotypes and prejudices.

Mother's case

• • Prosecutor's Closing Argument https://youtu.be/OmqISCVio-s?si=yLdlGKC6MMjWeRNc

• • Defense Closing Argument https://youtu.be/7xeewqfqBLc?si=CvieY1QwRF4ao1w8

Compare: Father's Case

• • Prosecutor's Closing Argument

https://youtu.be/ovAi4LAR5vg?si=sVoqfBDQ-a2QAPZC

• • Defense Closing Argument

https://youtu.be/r2Z8-asz0gg?si=dXeB8ROqOhuCH5Yk

3) Prove you watched each of the arguments, by answering each (approx. a few sentences each):

3a) , describe the theme of the prosecutor's case against mother.

3b), describe the theme of the prosecutor's case against father.

3c) Use three (3) quotes/arguments to show how the prosecutor's argument was based on prejudices and gender stereotypes about proper feminine behavior and motherhood.

3d) Given that the result was the same - both parents were convicted - do you believe that prejudices and stereotypes impacted the result? Explain the basis for your opinion by comparing the arguments made in mother's case to the arguments made in father's case.