You get the following data:

You get the following data: Clothing Condition (1 = Superhero, 2 = Street Clothes) * When do superheroes work harder? Crosstabulation When do superheroes work harder? In their costume In their street clothes Total Clothing Condition Boys dressed in Count 27 31 (1 = Superhero. 2= Superhero clothes % within Clothing 87.1% 12.9% 100.0% Street Clothes) Condition (1 = Superhero, 2 = Street Clothes) Boys dressed in Count 22 7 29 street clothes % within Clothing 75.9% 24.1% 100.0% Condition (1 = Superhero, 2 = Street Clothes) Total Count 49 11 60 % within Clothing 81.7% 18.3% 100.0% Condition (1 = Superhero, 2 = Street Clothes)Chi-Square Tests Asymptotic Significance Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1- Value df (2-sided) sided) sided) Pearson Chi-Square 1.263 261 Continuity Correction 624 429 Likelihood Ratio 1.273 259 Fisher's Exact Test 327 215 Linear-by-Linear 1.242 265 Association N of Valid Cases 60 Symmetric Measures Approximate Value Significance Nominal by Nominal Phi 145 261 Cramer's V 145 261 N of Valid Cases 60Clothing Condition (1 = Superhero, 2 = Street Clothes, 3 = Choice) " When do superheroes work harder? Crosstabulation When do superheroes work harder? In their In their street costume clothes Total Clothing Condition (1 = Boys dressed in Count 27 31 Superhero, 2 = Street Superhero clothes % within Clothing 87.1% 12.9% 100.0% Clothes, 3 = Choice) Condition (1 = Superhero, 2 = Street Clothes, 3= Choice) Boys dressed in street Count 22 7 29 clothes % within Clothing 75.9% 24.1% 100.0% Condition (1 = Superhero, 2 = Street Clothes, 3= Choice) Boys given a choice of Count 26 30 how to dress % within Clothing 86.7% 13.3% 100.0% Condition (1 = Superhero, 2 = Street Clothes, 3 = Choice Total Count 75 15 90 % within Clothing 83.3% 16.7% 100.0% Condition (1 = Superhero, 2 = Street Clothes, 3 = Choice)Chi-Square Tests Asymptotic Significance Value (2-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 1.722" 423 Likelihood Ratio 1.644 2 439 Linear-by-Linear 003 955 Association N of Valid Cases 90 a. 1 cells (16.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 4.83 Symmetric Measures Approximate Value Significance Nominal by Nominal Phi 138 423 Cramer's V 138 423 N of Valid Cases 90