Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

You have disaggregated the length of stay values and separated them into their appropriate MS-DRG category, but you still haven't answered the question that prompted

You have disaggregated the length of stay values and separated them into their appropriate MS-DRG category, but you still haven't answered the question that prompted the initial analysis: Is your facility's ALOS for heart failure consistent with that of all Medicare heart failure patients? You want to complete the analysis by testing the hypothesis that your facility's ALOS is greater than the Medicare benchmark. More formally, you have specified the following null and alternative hypotheses:

  • Ho: OUR ALOS FOR DRG = BENCHMARK ALOS FOR DRG
  • H1: OUR ALOS FOR DRG > BENCHMARK ALOS FOR DRG

The benchmark data will be the ALOS figures reported by CMS for 2016 (the most recent data available) that were used in Assignment 3.1:

CMS Data

The CMS spreadsheet contains MS-DRG data (number of discharges and mean length of stay (LOS)) for each in 2016. These figures are what CMS reported for 2016. Use the z-test function to test the hypothesis for each of the three MS-DRGs: 291, 292, 293.

You have some familiarity with the Excel software and you have read about finding probabilities using standardized scores. You decide to answer the probability question posed above using Excel's z.test function given as:

=z.test(range:range,CMS LOS), where range:range represents the cells where the facility data are located, and CMS LOS is the national average against which to compare (note, leave the ''sigma'' value blank).

For a demonstration of how to use Excel's z test function, view the video tutorialCalculating a z test in Excel(Transcript of Calculating a z test in Excel Tutorial)

The results of this test will tell you the probability that you will reject the null hypothesis when it is actually true (i.e., that you will say your ALOS is greater than the benchmark when in reality your ALOS is not statistically different than the benchmark). This is known as a "Type I" error, and you want the probability of making this type of error to be as small as possible. The conventional threshold (or comfort level) for making this type of mistake is five percent (i.e., you are willing to accept that in five samples out of 100 you will mistakenly reject the null hypothesis when it is true). Naturally, a probability that is smaller is preferred since the likelihood of having made a mistake is smaller. This is essentially what a "p-value" represents: the probability of making a Type I error (of rejecting the null hypothesis when it is true, or in practical terms, concluding that a difference exists when in reality none exists).

Run your calculations using the data specified above to determine if your facility's ALOS for heart failure is consistent with that of all Medicare heart failure patients. Then, prepare a brief so that you can replicate your analysis at some future date. Your brief should include the following:

  1. Discuss whether, in future analyses, you will collect data from a sample of heart failure patients at your facility or look at all heart failure patients at your facility. Be sure to support this decision.
  2. Distinguish between the statistics and parameters that you are using (i.e., what are the statistics and what are the parameters?).
  3. Once you have estimated the probabilities for each MS-DRG, explain whether you believe your facility has ALOS that are within an acceptable range (i.e. are statistically the same) compared to the national average.
  4. Paste a screenshot of your Excel calculations into the last page of your assignment submission.

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Quantitative Analysis For Management

Authors: Barry Render, Ralph M. Stair, Michael E. Hanna

11th Edition

9780132997621, 132149117, 132997622, 978-0132149112

Students also viewed these Mathematics questions

Question

Has the money needed to purchase my product been allocated?

Answered: 1 week ago