You have now learned the criteria that a restriction of commercial speech must meet to be valid, and you've had a chance to discuss why commercial speech is protected. You should understand that commercial speech is not protected to the same degree as political speech. Restrictions of political speech must be supported by compelling interests. Restrictions of commercial speech must be protected by substantial interests. Substantial is a lower standard than compelling. Do you think that this distinction should be removed, so that commercial speech is protected to the same degree as political speech? Or, should the standard remain the same?