You must select and analyze Case #1 (listed below) and answer the questions that follow the case.. Case #1: Marge Hopkins was a women's soccer coach at Treeline University in Montana. It was a state university of about 6,000 students and played at the NCAA Division I level. During the 2019-2020 school year, Coach Hopkins expressed concern to the Athletic Director that her players were playing with hand me down equipment from the men's soccer team. The best soccer field was scheduled and used only by the men's team. Practice was only provided at night after 7 p.m. for the women's soccer team. The travel budget was a fraction of the men's budget and meal money and the number of scholarships were a quarter of the men's number. Salary for female coaches was half of what the men's coaches received. When Coach 'Hopkins brought this to the attention of the AD, he told her to stop complaining and that she was lucky to have a team at all. He told her if she wanted a bigger budget, then she would need to go out and raise the money. Questions: 1. Do you feel that Coach Hopkins might have an EEOC claim here? 2. What are the main legal issues that appear here? 3. If the college turned around and fired Coach Hopkins for filing a complaint, do you think there might be some safeguards for her? Explain. 4. How would you analyze this case in terms of the 3-Prong Test? Do you feel that Treeline University is potentially not in compliance