You read the case, LeMond Cycling, Inc., v. PTI Holding, Inc., in chapter 18 of your text. The issue in that case was whether PTI was in breach of its contract with LCP. Based on the facts presented, the best analysis is O Protective breached the contract by contacting Schwinn O Protective was obligated to provide reports to LeMond on a regular basis Protective materially breached the contract because it did not inform LeMond of the current status of sales O Protective failed to use commercially reasonable efforts to sell LeMond products