You will read more about theMahanoycase on Oyez (link provided below) and compose an argumentative short detailed writing in substantive sentences answering the following:

Should the student's speech inMahanoy be considered "Tinker speech" (i.e. protected under the Tinker precedent)?

https://www.oyez.org/cases/2020/20-255

contain the following elements in your response:

• A clear and concise claim that answers the question.
• Specific arguments made by the majority opinion in Tinker to support your claim.
• Analysis and explanation as to how the arguments in Tinker do or do not apply to the Mahanoy case.
• A counter-argument that considers the opposite perspective.
• NO in the first person ("I" statements)
• A helpful hint: Make sure your thinking is guided not by your feelings per se, but by the case law. What does the law under Tinker have to say about the speech in Mahanoy?