You will recall from the Workplace Law video Human Rights Fact Pattern: X-treme Madness, that Gail Thorel was employed as a graphic designer with a video game developer called X-treme Madness. A colleague of Ms. Thorel's, Amir Sauvey, had complained to their supervisor about Ms. Thorel loudly voicing her religious beliefs on homosexuality while at work. When their supervisor and the HR director met with Ms. Thorel and told her that her desk was being moved to a separate area and that she was no longer permitted to speak about her religious beliefs at work, Ms. Thorel stormed out of the office and filed a complaint with the Human Rights Tribunal

In the discrimination claim made by Ms. Thorel, who will likely prevail in a case based of the facts? Who should prevail?