Your assignment is skim theCitizens Unitedopinion and discuss:

1. Which line of reasoning did the Court follow in reaching its decision inCitizens United. Specifically, did the Court side with the reasoning inFirst National Bank of Boston-or --Austinv.Michigan Chamber of Commerce?
2. What language did the Court inCitizens Uniteduse in discussing these two cases? Quote from the opinion.
3. IsAustinv.Michigan Chamber of Commercestill the current state of the law (is it valid or "good law") following theCitizens Unitedopinion? Why or why not? Use language from the articles you read and the Citizens United opinion to support your view

Here are the links to the assignment for answers

please use I am struggling in class and need some assistance!

https://www.thenation.com/article/archive/debating-citizens-united/

https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2015/01/20/citizens-united-misunderstood-five-years-free-speech-anniversary-critics-column/22076597/

https://www.oyez.org/cases/2008/08-205