Your client, Ms. Kimberly Hall, stands convicted under your state law for charges involving theft, trafficking in stolen property, fraud, and alteration of vehicle identification numbers.Hall runs a small salvage yard on a 3.5-acre property surrounded by several fences, tall trees, dense scrub bushes, andposted No Trespassing signs.The property contains 2 structures:a small one-room cabin, in which Hall resides, and a separate structure, approximately 30 feet high, with sliding barn doors on all four sides, no windows, and no roof.

Early on the day of Hall's arrest, state and local authorities conducted a drone surveillance sweep after an anonymous tip line received several calls reporting the operation of multiple automotive chop shops in a rural location within your state of residence.Captured video of the larger structure, obtained by the drone's camera from approximately 100 feet in the air and simultaneously transmitted to police officers on the ground, revealed the presence of multiple dismantled vehicles, a pile of license plates, various automotive parts and tools, including grinders, cutting saws, hoists, and welding rigs.Hall was taken into police custody at approximately 5:00 a.m. that morning and was subsequently charged based on that footage.

At trial, several residents claimed that the presence of the drones in the early morning hours resulted in unnecessary panic, which quickly swept the small community. They resulted in multiple calls to local police dispatch, minor property damage, and at least one assault.Sally Jones, who lives adjacent to Ms. Hall, testifiedthat "Conner Peterson and those damned drones caused enough drama and paranoia to end a 25-year friendship in a fistfight."Conner Peterson, a survivalist/prepper and avid short-wave radio enthusiast, stated for the record that, on the morning of Hall's arrest, he was up late monitoring radio transmissions between members of a known local anti-government group who were discussing plans for "something big" involving the use of personal drones.Mr. Peterson stated that he heard an unusual buzzing noise coming from the west side of his property as he stood outside with his dog at approximately 4:00 a.m.When he spotted a drone hovering between his house and his garage, he immediately began calling to warn his neighbors that something was up and to remain vigilant.

The trial court considered all testimony, exhibits, and arguments and found your client guilty.

What are the legal issues in this case?

What are the Index of Authorities in this case?

What is the Statement of Jurisdiction in this case?

What are Question(s) Presented in this case?

What is the Statement of the Facts in this case?

What is the Argument in this case?

What is the Conclusion in this case?

What is the Relief in this case?

Using your Westlaw subscription, research and correctly identify the legal issue or issues involved.Locate, correctly cite, and thoroughly apply the following:

1. At least one source of primarylegal authorityfromNorth Carolina.
2. At least one court opinion that would be the mandatory authority for the court to which you're appealing; 10th District of Wake County; this may or may not be the same source meeting the requirement inNo. 1 above.
3. At least one source of persuasive authority; this may be secondary or primary, but not mandatory.