You're In graduate school at a major research university, pursuing your t'i'iLi In chemistry. You've completed a series of experiments for your doctoral dissertation. Some of the data you've gathered in these experiments supports the hypothesis you've been trying to prove, while some does just the opposite. Your doctoral program requires you to publish one academic paper based on your research in a professional scientic journal. If you were to write and publish a paper focusing solely on the good data you've gathered in your experiments, you'd be on your way to securing your PhD, and you'd likely get additional funding. 0n the other hand, if you write and publish a paper highlighting all your data, you'd be taking a considerable risk. The organization paying for your research might be disappointed and terminate your funding. What Do You Do? a) Write and publish a paper highlighting all your data, but focus mostly on the good data despite the risk of losing your research funding. b) Write and publish a paper highlighting only the good data. c) Tell the funding organization about the experiments and offer to repeat them in an attempt to get better data to support the hypothesis