Zaldin vs Concord Hotel. Concord hotel lost the case because:

Group of answer choices

A. the state did not have a limiting liability law

B. a hotel employee stole the guest's jewelry

C. the hotel's safe was not available after midnight

D. the hotel did not post a notice of the limiting liability law

Paraskevaides VS Fourseason

The Four Seasons Washington lost its case (p. 288) because:

Group of answer choices

A. Washington DC does not have a limiting liability law

B. the plaintiff did not know about the limiting liability law

C. the hotel purchased defective in-room safes

D. a hotel employee stole the jewelry

E. the notice of the limiting liability law was posted in the wrong place

If the exact same thing as the Tienda case happened again today, what would be the outcome? Why?