Zsofia, who works in a jewelry store owned by Boglarka, was asked by Boglarka to pick up some gemstones during her lunch hour, for use in the store. Boglarka was aware that Zsofia was using her own vehicle. Zsofia had often traveled the route when doing errands for Boglarka. On the way back to the jewelry store, Zsofia went through a drive-through at a fast food restaurant that was close to the jewelry store to get a soda. While in line, she negligently bumped the vehicle in front of her that was owned by Agoston. Zsofia did not have insurance and her driver's license had expired. Since Zsofia was working for Boglarka, Agoston asked Boglarka to pay for the damage to his bumper. Boglarka refused on the basis that she never gave Zsofia permission to stop for a soda. In your response, you are to discuss the various theories or theory of agency that are applicable in this scenario, and discuss whether Boglarka or Zsofia should be held liable and pay the for the damages to Agoston's vehicle. [Hints: Rely on the facts presented in the scenario, no what ifs, or speculations, or examples. Use the terminology that is used in the textbook and define the terms as to their applicability in the scenario. Merely citing what is said in the textbook and giving a page reference is not sufficient for a response, you must relate any quote from the textbook to the facts in the scenario, i.el, do not merely copy a sentence and provide a page number.] [In order to answer the question properly, it is strongly suggested that you read O'Connor v. Mcdonald's Restaurants (1990). A link to the copy of O'Connor is in the Module. If and when you refer to the case, you need to only state "in O'Connor," and then why you are referring to a specific passage. Please do not state, "as stated in O'Connor," without mentioning the passage that you are referring to.] Please read Kubase