According to the court in In re Seats, Inc., why was the trademark SEATS neither generic nor
Question:
According to the court in In re Seats, Inc., why was the trademark “SEATS” neither generic nor descriptive?
a. The term “seats” is not generic in relation to chair or couches or bleachers.
b. Seats, Inc. was selling seats in the form of tickets.
c. Competitors could still use the term “seats” in advertising.
d. “Seats” was not a common descriptive name of reservation services.
Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!
Step by Step Answer:
Related Book For
Sport Law A Managerial Approach
ISBN: 9781621590033
3rd Edition
Authors: Linda A Sharp, Anita M Moorman, Cathryn L Claussen
Question Posted: