Consider the following list of imaginary binding case precedents in your jurisdiction.

Use it to analogize or distinguish the “cases” listed below.

1999—Discrimination against reds is not allowed.

2001—It is acceptable to exclude squares.

2003—Discrimination against greens is not allowed.

Case A: You feel you have been discriminated against because you are purple.

How would your lawyer argue your case? What would the opposing lawyer argue?

Case B: You feel you have been discriminated against because you are a purple square. How would your lawyer argue your case? What would the opposing lawyer argue? :

Case C: You feel you have been discriminated against because you are a triangle.

How would your lawyer argue your case? What would the opposing lawyer argue?

Case D: You feel you have been discriminated against because you are a translucent sphere. How would your lawyer argue your case? What would the opposing lawyer argue?