Margrethe and Charles Pyeatte, a married couple, agreed that she would work so that he could go to law school and that when he finished, she would go back to school for her master’s degree. After Charles was admitted to the bar and before Margrethe went back to school, the two were divorced. She sued Charles, claiming that she was entitled to quasi-contractual recovery of the money that 282 Part 2 Contracts she had paid for Charles’s support and law school tuition. He denied liability.

Was she entitled to recover for the money she spent for Charles’s maintenance and law school tuition? [Pyeatte v Pyeatte, 661 P2d 196 (Ariz App)]

Appendix