Syrovy and Alpine Resources, Inc., entered into a “Timber Purchase Agreement.” Syrovy agreed to sell and Alpine agreed to buy all of the timber produced during a two-year period. The timber to be sold, purchased, and delivered was to be produced by Alpine from timber on Syrovy’s land. Alpine continued harvesting for one year and then stopped after making an initial payment. Syrovy sued Alpine. Alpine alleged there was no contract because the writing to satisfy the statute of frauds must contain a quantity term. Decide. [Syrovy v Alpine Resources, Inc., 841 P2d 1279 (Wash App)]