The appellate judge who reviewed the lower court opinion in this case observed that Marshall may have been morally obligated to warn Rojass new employer

Question

22 users unlocked this solution today!

The appellate judge who reviewed the lower court opinion in this case observed that Marshall may have been “morally obligated” to warn Rojas’s new employer of her prior criminal conduct. Explain the difference between a “moral obligation” and a “legal obligation.” If someone fails to honor a moral obligation, has he or she behaved “unethically”?