The law firm of Traystman, Coric, and Keramidas represented Andrew Daigle in a divorce in Norwich, Connecticut. Scott McGowan, an attorney with the firm, handled the two-day trial. After the first day of the trial, McGowan demanded that Daigle sign a promissory note for the amount that Daigle then owed to the firm, or McGowan would withdraw from the case and Daigle would be forced to get another attorney or to continue the trial by himself. Daigle said that he wanted another attorney, Martin Rutchik, to see the note. McGowan urged Daigle to sign it and assured him that a copy would be sent to Rutchik. Feeling that he had no other choice, Daigle signed the note. When he did not pay, the law firm filed a suit in a Connecticut state court against him. Daigle asserted that the note was unenforceable because he had signed it under duress. Traystman, Coric, & Keramidas. v. Daigle, 84 Conn. App. 843, 855 A.2d 996 (2004).