Question: The model from Ex. 9.18, without inclusion of X4 and X5, when tested for het- eroscedasticity following the White test outlined in regression (9.14), yielded
The model from Ex. 9.18, without inclusion of X4 and X5, when tested for het- eroscedasticity following the White test outlined in regression (9.14), yielded the following regression results. To save space, we have given only the t statistics and their p values. The results were obtained from the EViews statistical package.
.png)
a. How do you interpret the preceding regression?
b. Do these results suggest that the model above suffers from the problem of heteroscedasticity? How do you know?
c. If the above regression suffers from heteroscedasticity, how would you get rid of it?
=-15.76 + 0.381OX2i-45641Xy + 0.000005X + 0.1328X,0.0050X2(Xy (-0.01) (0.60) (098910.556) (0.13) (0.87) (0.895) (0.394) (056) (-0.85) (0.581) (0400) p value R2 = 0.23
Step by Step Solution
3.49 Rating (176 Votes )
There are 3 Steps involved in it
a The regression results show that the none of the co... View full answer
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
Document Format (1 attachment)
849-M-E-E-A (356).docx
120 KBs Word File
