Trackers is three days late in delivering the tracking to Coasters. Amritha now wants to rely on the clause in the contract that Trackers will pay $5000 for each day that the tracking is late, and is claiming that Trackers owes Coasters$15000. However, Trackers points out that Amritha has not been inconvenienced by the late delivery, because construction on the rollercoaster had already been delayed by two weeks. It has been a week and a half since Trackers was able to deliver the tracking, and Coasters has still been unable to use it. Is Amritha entitled to rely on the clause and collect the $15000? Do you need any additional information to make your decision?