Victoria Enterprises Inc. is evaluating alternative uses for a three-storey manufacturing and warehousing building that it has
Question:
The building will be used for only 15 years for either product A or product B. After 15 years, the building will be too small for efficient production of either product line. At that time Victoria plans to rent the building to firms similar to the current occupants. To rent the building again, Victoria will need to restore the building to its present layout. The estimated cash cost of restoring the building if product A has been undertaken is $55,000; if product B has been produced, the cash cost will be $80,000. These cash costs can be deducted for tax purposes in the year the expenditures occur.
Victoria will depreciate the original building shell (purchased for $1,450,000) at a CCA rate of 5 percent, regardless of which alternative it chooses. The building modifications fall into CCA class 13 and are depreciated using the straight-line method over a 15-year life. Equipment purchases for either product are in class 8 and have a CCA rate of 20 percent. The firms tax rate is 34 percent, and its required rate of return on such investments is 12 percent.
For simplicity, assume all cash flows for a given year occur at the end of the year. The initial outflows for modifications and equipment will occur at t = 0, and the restoration outflows will occur at the end of year 15. Also, Victoria has other profitable ongoing operations that are sufficient to cover any losses.
Which use of the building would you recommend to management?
Step by Step Answer:
Corporate Finance
ISBN: 978-0071339575
7th Canadian Edition
Authors: Stephen Ross, Randolph Westerfield, Jeffrey Jaffe, Gordon Ro