A land developer started a retirement village in an area known for its large cattle feedlots.
Later, after much of the village was built and sold, the developer brought a nuisance action against the largest feedlot owner in the area.
The developer claimed that the feedlot was polluting the air with terrible odors, causing discomfort to the residents of the village and reducing the value of the remaining lots. Assume the court found the feedlot to be a nuisance. What should be the remedy? Could the feedlot be a nuisance in one location and acceptable in another? [Spur Industries v. Del Webb Development, 494 P.2d 700, Sup. Ct., Ariz.(1972)]