a) Neither party said anything about warranties. Did the goods come with any warranties?
b) What was the express warranty?
c) What were the implied warranties and how were they created?
d) What does the implied warranty of merchantability require?
e) What is the full name of the implied warranty of fitness, and what does it require?
f) At trial, Byblos claimed that it did not intend any warranties to apply. Based on the facts as described, rule on this claim?
g) The contract said nothing about Morris's right to inspect the goods. Did the retailer have such a right?
h) Suppose Morris found some clothing in one shipment to be defective. Could it reject the entire shipment?
i) If Morris found some clothing defective but other items acceptable, could it keep some and reject the others?
j) Does the Code require rejection be in a certain form?
k) Byblos delivered about 14 shipments and had received only partial payment. What was its most likely remedy?
l) Morris did inspect all goods as they arrived. After Byblos sued to its contract price, Morris rejected many of the goods. Comment.
m) Inspection followed by silence amounts to what?
n) Who won?