a) Was this a bilateral or unilateral contract?
b) How can you tell?
c) Did Nationwide intend this offer to be taken seriously?
d) If Nationwide didn't intend it to be taken seriously then why did the jury find that Mears' accepted it and created a contract?
e) Aren't the terms of this offer fairly vague?
f) What is a judgment n.o.v.?
g) What happened on appeal?
h) What lesson should we draw from this example?