Furniture Products is a multi division manufacturer. The divisions are autonomous segments; each division is responsible for

Question:

Furniture Products is a multi division manufacturer. The divisions are autonomous segments; each division is responsible for its own sales, costs of operations, working capital management, and equipment acquisition. Each division serves a different market in the furniture industry. Because the markets and products of the divisions are so different, there have never been any transfers between divisions.
The Commercial Division manufactures equipment and furniture that is purchased by the restaurant industry. The division plans to introduce a new line of counter and chair units that feature a cushioned seat for the counter chairs. J. Kline, the division manager, has discussed the manufacturing of the cushioned seat with R. Fiegel of the Office Division. They both believe a cushioned seat currently made by the Office Division for use on its deluxe office stool could be modified for use on the new counter chair. Consequently, Kline has asked Fiegel for a price for 100 unit lots of the cushioned seat. The following conversation took place about the price to be charged for the cushioned seats.
Fiegel: We can make the necessary modifications to the cushioned seat easily. The raw materials used in your seat are slightly different and should cost about 10% more than those used in our deluxe office stool. However, the labor time should be the same, because the seat fabrication operation basically is the same. I would price the seat at our regular rate-full cost plus 30% markup.
Kline: That's higher that I expected. I was thinking that a good price would be your vari¬able manufacturing costs. After all, your capacity costs will be incurred regardless of this job.
Fiegel: I'm currently operating at capacity. By making the cushion seats for you, I'll have cut my production of deluxe office stools. Of course, I can increase my production of economy office stools. The labor time freed by not having to fabricate the frame or assemble the deluxe stool can be shifted to the frame fabrication and assembly of the economy office stool. Fortunately, I can switch my labor force between these two models of stools without any loss of efficiency. As you know, overtime is not a feasible alternative in our company. I'd like to sell it to you at variable costs, but I have excess demand for both products. I don't mind changing my product mix to the economy model if I get a good return on the seats I make for you. My standard costs for the two stools and a schedule of my factory overhead are included in these statements (statements follow).

Kline: I guess I see your point, but I don't want to price myself out of the market. Maybe we should talk to corporate management to see if they can give us any guidance.
Required:
(1) Kline and Fiegel did ask corporate management for guidance on an appropriate transfer price. Corporate management suggested they consider using a transfer price based on variable manufacturing cost plus opportunity cost. Calculate a transfer price for the cushioned seat based on variable manufacturing cost plus opportunity cost.
(2) Which alternative transfer price system, full cost, variable manufacturing cost, or variable manufacturing cost plus opportunity cost, is better as the underlying concept for the intracompany transfer price policy? Explain your answer.