Question: Is the provision that requires arbitration and then permits appeal by either party void as unconscionable? Ruth Klopp had auto insurance with Worldwide. She was

Is the provision that requires arbitration and then permits appeal by either party void as unconscionable?

Ruth Klopp had auto insurance with Worldwide. She was injured in a serious accident that left her with permanent neck and back injuries. The other driver was uninsured, so Klopp filed a claim with Worldwide under her “uninsured motorist” coverage. Her policy required arbitration of such a claim, and the arbitrators awarded Klopp $90,000. But the policy also stated that if the arbitrators awarded more than the statutory minimum amount of insurance ($15,000), either side could appeal the award and request a full trial. Worldwide appealed and demanded a trial.
In the trial court, Klopp claimed that the appeal provision was unconscionable and void. The trial court agreed and entered judgment for the full $90,000. Worldwide appealed.

Step by Step Solution

3.27 Rating (159 Votes )

There are 3 Steps involved in it

1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock

Holding Judgment for Klopp affirmed Public policy favors arbitration But here although the contract ... View full answer

blur-text-image
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!

Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts

Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock

Document Format (1 attachment)

Word file Icon

215-L-B-L-C (1072).docx

120 KBs Word File

Students Have Also Explored These Related Business Law Questions!