2. How might the misunderstanding have been significantly reduced if the reporter and interviewee had been more familiar with each other’s first language? Jockey Jose Santos filed a libel claim against the Miami Herald, seeking $48 million in damages over a reporter’s misunderstanding of his accented English.

The Herald published a photograph showing Santos apparently holding an object in his hand as he rode thoroughbred Funny Cide across the finish line in the 2003 Kentucky Derby. In the accompanying story, reporter Frank Carlson misquoted the jockey as stating the object was an illegal “cue ring.” The item turned out to be a Q-Ray, an ionized bracelet the jockey wore to help with his arthritis. As a result of the story, the Kentucky Racing Commission launched an investigation into what one official called “very suspicious” behavior.

The newspaper later printed a correction, but jockey Santos maintained that the story caused him emotional distress. The horse’s owners were co-parties in the lawsuit, alleging that the article’s allegation of underhanded racing tactics cost them potential business.

Santos’ attorney said that the misunderstanding would never have happened if the Herald had chosen a Spanish-speaking reporter. In the same vein, the editor of Miami’s alternative paper New Times commented: “Let me get this straight: In Miami, the most Hispanic city in the country, the newspaper of record screwed up because someone misunderstood a Spanish speaker?”